TRT / RTR Design [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2017-05-03 22:04  – Posting: # 17303
Views: 6,006

Hi Hötzi,

» » "The approach of reference-scaled average BE (RSABE) requires that the reference formulation be measured twice in each subject."
» … slipped through my intention. My fault. This statement is – despite the two great authors – wrong.

Not your fault. As a reviewer you are not and will never be responsible for anything authored by others. :ok:

But having said that I think the sentence is OK, only the meaning is a bit out of context. To calculate meaningfully the intra-subject variability for Ref we need subjects in whom it has been measured (at least) twice. That was presumably what the authors tried to remind readers.
The entire issue of rsaBE cannot be approached in the absence of such subjects, and therefore the sentence makes quite some sense.

Blumentopferde :cool:

I could be wrong, but...
Best regards,
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,514 posts in 4,141 threads, 1,336 registered users;
online 13 (1 registered, 12 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 23:03 CEST

We must be careful not to confuse data with the abstractions
we use to analyze them.    William James

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5