Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-09-25 06:19 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

Relationship between calculated 90% CI and sign. treatment effect in BE [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by GM - India, 2017-03-27 19:40  - Posting: # 17188
Views: 1,492

Dear All,

I have a doubt that, is there any relationship between calculated 90% CI and significant treatment effect in BE studies.

If the 90%CI is one side of hundred, i.e. either (85.00-98.00) or (102.00-119.00) then there should be significant treatment effect. Is this statement correct...?

And why we are generally checking the treatment effect at 5% level of significance...?

Please clarify.

Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
GM.

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,323 Posts in 3,705 Threads, 1,067 registered users;
34 users online (0 registered, 34 guests).

The belief that there is only one truth and
that oneself is in possession of it,
seems to me the deepest root of all
that is evil in the world.    Max Born

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed