Relationship between calculated 90% CI and sign. treatment effect in BE [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by GM – India, 2017-03-27 21:40 (2557 d 21:13 ago) – Posting: # 17188
Views: 9,621

Dear All,

I have a doubt that, is there any relationship between calculated 90% CI and significant treatment effect in BE studies.

If the 90%CI is one side of hundred, i.e. either (85.00-98.00) or (102.00-119.00) then there should be significant treatment effect. Is this statement correct...?

And why we are generally checking the treatment effect at 5% level of significance...?

Please clarify.

Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
GM.

Best Regards,
GM

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,638 registered users;
86 visitors (1 registered, 85 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:54 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shows a lack of mathematical education more
than an overly precise calculation.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5