Study costs: Replicate vs. 2×2×2 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mahmoud-teaima  – 2017-03-23 09:17 (2552 d 23:58 ago) – Posting: # 17178
Views: 24,160

Hi Helmut,

❝ Calculation of costs is complicated (fixed & variable costs, blahblah). In my CRO we had a spreadsheet with 100 rows… Had a quick look (19 samples / period, last sampling 16 hours; 2×2×2 in 42 subjects vs. 2×2×4 in 22). The replicate design would be ~4% cheaper. ;-) If you hope for RSABE (for CVwR 31% 18 subjects instead of 22 for ABE) the reduction in costs would be ~12%.


Can you please help me for in the approximate estimation of cost of bioequivalence study?, would you please send me the template sheet that you use for such calculations.

Greetings.

Mahmoud Teaima, PhD.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,940 posts in 4,812 threads, 1,639 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:15 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Those people who think they know everything
are a great annoyance to those of us who do.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5