Study costs: Replicate vs. 2×2×2 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mahmoud-teaima  – 2017-03-23 09:17 (2563 d 00:43 ago) – Posting: # 17178
Views: 24,196

Hi Helmut,

❝ Calculation of costs is complicated (fixed & variable costs, blahblah). In my CRO we had a spreadsheet with 100 rows… Had a quick look (19 samples / period, last sampling 16 hours; 2×2×2 in 42 subjects vs. 2×2×4 in 22). The replicate design would be ~4% cheaper. ;-) If you hope for RSABE (for CVwR 31% 18 subjects instead of 22 for ABE) the reduction in costs would be ~12%.


Can you please help me for in the approximate estimation of cost of bioequivalence study?, would you please send me the template sheet that you use for such calculations.

Greetings.

Mahmoud Teaima, PhD.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
118 visitors (0 registered, 118 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:00 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5