Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2018-05-21 11:17 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

Study costs: Replicate seems to be cheaper [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by VStus - Poland, 2017-03-21 12:49  - Posting: # 17172
Views: 7,706

Hi Helmut,

We were able to get more than 4% discount for replicate versus equivalent '2x2'.

Our internal belief is that replicate is cheaper, but will take more time... And time is money...

We would rather do replicate study instead of large '2x2' with 2 or more groups due to the capacity of the clinic (if wash-out is not long).

Regards, VStus

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
18,269 posts in 3,882 threads, 1,161 registered users;
20 users online (1 registered, 19 guests).

Science is wonderfully equipped to answer the question “How?”
but it gets terribly confused when you ask the question “Why?”    Erwin Chargaff

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed