Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2018-02-22 13:56 CET (UTC+1h)
 

Highly Variable Drug BE Justification [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro - Denmark, 2017-03-20 06:55  - Posting: # 17167
Views: 6,232

Hi jag009,

» What if one conducted pilot studies and found that the ISCV is like 28/29%? My concensus still would be to proceed with RSABE approach since the it is a mixed approach which allows both RSABE(if Ref SD<0.294) and ABE analysis(if Ref SD>0.294)

That's valid, but if you are not really sure if you are just "borderline" then the additional overhead associated with the replicated design may not be worth it. You find an intra-CVR of 31%, and you scale the limits a wee bit etc. But the price you paid for this moderate scaling option could be much higher than you'd be paying for a conventional 222BE trial with a few extra volunteers. Would be interesting to discuss an objective function here :-)

This isn' the answer, but just a view.

I could be wrong, but…


Best regards,
ElMaestro

- Bootstrapping for dissolution data is a relatively new hobby of mine.

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
17,931 Posts in 3,818 Threads, 1,120 registered users;
37 users online (1 registered, 36 guests).

When people learn no tools of judgment
and merely follow their hopes,
the seeds of political manipulation are sown.    Stephen Jay Gould

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed