Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-04-29 01:47 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

Refuse-to-Receive Standards [Design Issues]

posted by M.tareq - 2017-03-17 13:11  - Posting: # 17161
Views: 505

sorry for the late reply

Thanks Dan and Helmut

question about unexpected high variability in fast state, and sample size estimation based on published assessment reports other BE studies
read in your lectures about pooling of CV, however the validity of sample size estimation based on these studies, what if we ended up with higher CV than expected, would be allowable to go with a 2nd stage, after power evaluation ?


thanks in advance

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
16,784 Posts in 3,605 Threads, 1,033 registered users;
16 users online (0 registered, 16 guests).

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed