Not estimable in the model [BE/BA News]

posted by The user – Russia, 2017-03-14 11:13  – Posting: # 17154
Views: 16,085

» Try a type I model with Group before Subjects, then you'll get something that is estimable, I believe.

Thank you for your reply.

Sorry, but I did not catch the idea. Should I try this model: Group+Patient(Sequence)+Sequence+Period+Treatment?

One more comment: the groups are unbalanced. Type I is suiatable for balanced groups as I undertood. Looks like I could not use the Type I model.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,810 posts in 4,198 threads, 1,360 registered users;
online 9 (1 registered, 8 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 05:17 UTC

A big computer, a complex algorithm and a long time
does not equal science.    Robert Gentleman

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5