Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log-in |  Register |  Search

Back to the forum  Query: 2017-03-29 21:10 CEST (UTC+2h)
 

Data for 2nd stage of Potvin’s designs [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by BE-proff - Russia, 2017-02-18 06:40  - Posting: # 17078
Views: 1,176

Hi All,

I have some questions on Potvin's designs:;-)

1) is it correct that GMR and CV are required for sample size calculation for 2nd stage in all Potvin's designs?

2) Why Method C is considered "better" for sponsors than Method B?

The 1st question arised because Potvin's article dated 2007 says that only CV is needed for A and B while Method C uses both GMR and CV.

But on the other hand there are also opinions that all methods require GMR and CV.

Unclear....:confused:

Complete thread:

Back to the forum Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum | Admin contact
16,716 Posts in 3,587 Threads, 1,023 registered users;
15 users online (0 registered, 15 guests).

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
XHTML/CSS RSS Feed