Justification for the lack of incurred sample reanalysis [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2017-02-14 18:20 (2620 d 22:34 ago) – Posting: # 17058
Views: 2,949

Dear Irene
Please search the forum and you will find a lot of discussion on ISR. The guideline put an expiry date on old studies. If you now submit a study without ISR then this study does not reflect current scientific knowledge and will be certainly rejected. IMHO you can not argue the absence of ISR with 90% confidence interval even if the study result is not borderline.

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,661 registered users;
111 visitors (0 registered, 111 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5