3D [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2017-02-06 14:47 (3073 d 05:09 ago) – Posting: # 17021
Views: 30,032

Hi zizou,

❝ I know, someone can do it better (eg. in 3D like this kind of figure).


Your wish is my command. 3D-plots for GMR 0.95. Not sure whether they are more informative than yours.

Conventional BE (rest of the world)

[image]


Denmark: 100% included in 90% CI

[image]



I know only a few sample sizes by heart. One is for GMR 0.95, CV 30%, and target power 80%: 40 (expected power 81.6%). For Denmark with n=40 we get a mere 76.5%. Note the red contour lines at 70% power. As you discovered as well we never reach 80%. Fascinating the behavior at low CVs. If we increase the sample size, power decreases because a significant difference gets more likely. What a mess.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,684 registered users;
96 visitors (0 registered, 96 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5