LSM differences in SAS vs Phoenix [Software]
Hi Sundar,
From what you said, I guess you should check your SAS code first. Maybe you coded treatment as A and B for test and reference but you copy/paste the sas code from guideline or somewhere else? If so, change the order of -1 1 to 1 -1 in
If your sas code is correct then I couldn't think of any reason how one can screw up Phoenix setting since you would visually assigned which formulation is reference, whether it is coded as A/B, T/R or 1/2. You should know which is which.
From what you said, I guess you should check your SAS code first. Maybe you coded treatment as A and B for test and reference but you copy/paste the sas code from guideline or somewhere else? If so, change the order of -1 1 to 1 -1 in
estimate
statement since many of those code assume that the treatment is coded as T and R, so the order is reversed. e.g.ESTIMATE 'Test vs. Reference' treat -1 1
to ESTIMATE 'Test vs. Reference' treat 1 -1.If your sas code is correct then I couldn't think of any reason how one can screw up Phoenix setting since you would visually assigned which formulation is reference, whether it is coded as A/B, T/R or 1/2. You should know which is which.
—
All the best,
Shuanghe
All the best,
Shuanghe
Complete thread:
- LSM differences in SAS vs Phoenix msmnainar 2017-01-20 07:49
- LSM differences in SAS vs PhoenixShuanghe 2017-01-20 12:31
- Lexical order Helmut 2017-01-20 13:34
- Lexical order ElMaestro 2017-01-20 20:12