LSM differences in SAS vs Phoenix [Software]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2017-01-20 13:31 (2646 d 02:13 ago) – Posting: # 16990
Views: 5,026

Hi Sundar,

From what you said, I guess you should check your SAS code first. Maybe you coded treatment as A and B for test and reference but you copy/paste the sas code from guideline or somewhere else? If so, change the order of -1 1 to 1 -1 in estimate statement since many of those code assume that the treatment is coded as T and R, so the order is reversed. e.g.ESTIMATE 'Test vs. Reference' treat -1 1 to ESTIMATE 'Test vs. Reference' treat 1 -1.

If your sas code is correct then I couldn't think of any reason how one can screw up Phoenix setting since you would visually assigned which formulation is reference, whether it is coded as A/B, T/R or 1/2. You should know which is which.

All the best,
Shuanghe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,665 registered users;
99 visitors (0 registered, 99 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5