Validation of software for BE [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-08-26 13:20 (2798 d 17:31 ago) – Posting: # 16582
Views: 4,703

Salam Mahmoud,

❝ […] our local regulatory authority […] want a validation proof for that package and program.


Understandable after the Kinetica-disaster (which was very popular in the Middle East).

❝ Can anyone of our forum experts advise me on how to supply the proof for that request.


I suggest to compare bear’s results with the ones in other software packages. We published two papers on the topic in order to support users in validation.1,2 Following the PMC-links in PubMed the reference datasets are available.

Good luck!


  1. Schütz H, Labes D, Fuglsang A. Reference Datasets for 2-Treatment, 2-Sequence, 2-Period Bioequivalence Studies. AAPS J. 2014;16(6):1292–7. doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9661-0. PMID 25212768. [image] free resource.
  2. Fuglsang A, Schütz H, Labes D. Reference Datasets for Bioequivalence Trials in a Two-Group Parallel Design. AAPS J. 2015;17(2):400–4. doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9704-6. PMID 25488055. [image] free resource.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
119 visitors (1 registered, 118 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5