Re-consenting volunteers? [Off Topic]
Hi all,
I am not a native French speaker but I think I sometimes understand a little bit of written French.
(and I am not too hot on Google translate)
Does the inquest into the Bial/Biotrial incident suggest that the volunteers should perhaps, possibly, maybe have been asked to re-confirm their consent after the initial SAE in their dosing group? I have no idea legally, but I am not aware of any clear clause in ICH E6 or Eudralex etc. that would require it. I think the need to re-consent is solely a matter of interpretation and that is sometimes a dangerous tool is the hands of people who look over the shoulder with little regard to the present.
Did I get the document right about re-consent? I foresee a lot of trouble if CROs in the future need to preemptively re-consent study volunteers. In the absence of firm specfic written guidance it will be very difficult to decide when a re-consent is justified and necessary.
e.g.
-When any SAE's occur? If no, which then?
-When any AE occurs? A broken toenail? Headache? Absence of info from a volunteer who has retracted her/his consent without telling why? Someone being discontioued by an investigator? Etc.
Is there a French guideline or legal document specifically discussing re-consenting?
Thanks for any input. As they say in France: Muchas gracias.
I am not a native French speaker but I think I sometimes understand a little bit of written French.
(and I am not too hot on Google translate)
Does the inquest into the Bial/Biotrial incident suggest that the volunteers should perhaps, possibly, maybe have been asked to re-confirm their consent after the initial SAE in their dosing group? I have no idea legally, but I am not aware of any clear clause in ICH E6 or Eudralex etc. that would require it. I think the need to re-consent is solely a matter of interpretation and that is sometimes a dangerous tool is the hands of people who look over the shoulder with little regard to the present.
Did I get the document right about re-consent? I foresee a lot of trouble if CROs in the future need to preemptively re-consent study volunteers. In the absence of firm specfic written guidance it will be very difficult to decide when a re-consent is justified and necessary.
e.g.
-When any SAE's occur? If no, which then?
-When any AE occurs? A broken toenail? Headache? Absence of info from a volunteer who has retracted her/his consent without telling why? Someone being discontioued by an investigator? Etc.
Is there a French guideline or legal document specifically discussing re-consenting?
Thanks for any input. As they say in France: Muchas gracias.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? nobody 2016-01-15 16:49 [Off Topic]
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? Helmut 2016-01-15 17:25
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? nobody 2016-01-15 17:45
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? Helmut 2016-01-15 17:48
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? nobody 2016-01-15 18:02
- Structure Ohlbe 2016-01-18 13:42
- Structure nobody 2016-01-28 15:29
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? Helmut 2016-01-15 17:48
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? Ohlbe 2016-01-18 09:58
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? nobody 2016-01-18 15:07
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? nobody 2016-01-15 17:45
- Protocol Ohlbe 2016-01-22 17:18
- Protocol nobody 2016-01-23 18:37
- Protocol Ohlbe 2016-01-28 12:16
- Protocol ElMaestro 2016-01-28 15:07
- Protocol nobody 2016-01-28 15:40
- FIM / FIH Helmut 2016-01-28 17:10
- FIM / FIH nobody 2016-01-28 17:55
- There is something rotten in the state... nobody 2016-02-26 21:05
- Rotten or not rotten ? Ohlbe 2016-02-27 05:49
- Rotten or not rotten ? nobody 2016-02-27 10:56
- Rotten or not rotten ? Ohlbe 2016-02-27 14:00
- Rotten.. nobody 2016-04-25 17:21
- Blame game... nobody 2016-05-23 12:27
- FDA: "unique toxiciy" nobody 2016-08-15 16:38
- Blame game... nobody 2016-05-23 12:27
- Rotten.. nobody 2016-04-25 17:21
- Rotten or not rotten ? Ohlbe 2016-02-27 14:00
- Rotten or not rotten ? nobody 2016-02-27 10:56
- Rotten or not rotten ? Ohlbe 2016-02-27 05:49
- There is something rotten in the state... nobody 2016-02-26 21:05
- FIM / FIH nobody 2016-01-28 17:55
- FIM / FIH Helmut 2016-01-28 17:10
- Protocol nobody 2016-01-28 15:40
- Chronology - English version Ohlbe 2016-01-29 18:30
- Chronology - English version Helmut 2016-01-29 19:04
- Administrative inspection preliminary outcome Ohlbe 2016-02-04 23:30
- Chronology - English version Helmut 2016-01-29 19:04
- Protocol ElMaestro 2016-01-28 15:07
- Protocol Ohlbe 2016-01-28 12:16
- Protocol nobody 2016-01-23 18:37
- Re-consenting volunteers?ElMaestro 2016-06-21 16:42
- Re-consenting volunteers? Ohlbe 2016-06-22 05:06
- Re-consenting volunteers? nobody 2016-06-22 11:26
- Re-consenting volunteers? Ohlbe 2016-06-23 04:51
- Re-consenting volunteers? ElMaestro 2016-06-23 08:23
- Re-consenting volunteers? nobody 2016-06-23 10:36
- OT: strike d_labes 2016-06-23 11:31
- OT: strike Helmut 2016-06-23 13:01
- Re-consenting volunteers? ElMaestro 2016-06-23 08:23
- Re-consenting volunteers? Ohlbe 2016-06-23 04:51
- Re-consenting volunteers? nobody 2016-06-22 11:26
- Re-consenting volunteers? Ohlbe 2016-06-22 05:06
- Paper in the NEJM Ohlbe 2016-11-03 12:21
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? nobody 2017-06-09 10:01
- Death in phase I cannabinoid? Helmut 2016-01-15 17:25