complete or not [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-24 18:57 (2865 d 14:41 ago) – Posting: # 16361
Views: 29,095

Dear Detlew,

❝ ❝ My preference is REML/Satterthwaite because one could reproduce results in three different software packages.

Emphasis by me.


❝ That's not really a reason.


I stand corrected. ;-)

❝ The first sentences seem to point to an advantage of REML over ML estimation, left the question of the ddfm aside.


Yep. In dose proportionality quite often (much) more levels than in BE come into play. The highest I have seen so far were five. Unbalanced & incomplete data are more the rule than an exception. That’s why I would prefer REML.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
120 visitors (0 registered, 120 guests [including 0 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:39 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5