NCSS vs. PHX/WNL vs. SAS [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-05-17 03:50 (2898 d 16:15 ago) – Posting: # 16318
Views: 30,019

Hi Angus,

❝ I have repeated the above calculation in NCSS:

Intercept  1.9414  0.2496   0.000025 1.4849      2.3978      9.2
logDose    0.7617  0.0492   0.000005 0.6659      0.8576      5.9

Phoenix/WinNonlin:
           1.9414  0.2431   0.000020 1.4968      2.3860      9.2
           0.7617  0.0473   0.000004 0.6696      0.8539      5.9

Reported by Smith et al. (SAS Proc Mixed):
           1.94                      1.54        2.35
           0.7615                    0.679       0.844

Results by NCSS and Phoenix/WinNonlin are similar but don’t match SAS (whose CIs are wider). I love software.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,651 registered users;
57 visitors (1 registered, 56 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5