Phoenix 64 Warning [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by AngusMcLean – USA, 2016-05-15 22:11 (2894 d 04:11 ago) – Posting: # 16309
Views: 30,749

❝ […] We cross-validated Phoenix/WinNonlin and SAS many times. […] I love “push-the-button” statisticians reporting a 0.1% CV (‼) without hesitation. How plausible is that? […]


❝ Body height can be measured pretty precisely. Ask the worker whether he/she thinks that repeated measurements can be done to ±1/16″. If the answer is yes, ask which variability he/she expects in AUFC.


Yes; we are still in 1/16" units here. They are difficult to work with. It is highly unlikely for 0.1% to be correct. Sometimes people will believe what they find to be the most favorable. I will be finding out more soon about the other data. Meanwhile I wonder if Pharsight can come up with a SAS comparison.

Meanwhile I am off to visit a German store "Aldi"

Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,986 posts in 4,823 threads, 1,656 registered users;
50 visitors (0 registered, 50 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Art is “I”; science is “we”.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5