PowerTOST sample size EMA full replicate [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Astea – Russia, 2016-03-24 20:34 (2926 d 11:21 ago) – Posting: # 16135
Views: 9,468

Dear all!
I've noted that sample size, estimated with the help of PowerTOST's scABEL, depends on the difference between CV_T and CV_R.
Suppose we have a HVD with unknown CV (or CV is known in literature but it ranges widely through the studies). There could be a situation when CV_T and CV_R do not coincides. For example, CV_R=0.3 and CV_T=0.4. Then basing on the sampleN.scABEL for theta0=0.9 we need 48 subjects. But if we plan replicate study on the basis of CV=0.3 we get only 34 subjects. Moreover planing replicate study without scaling (sampleN.TOST) we get only 40 subjects. Here I post the graph for illustration purposes (scABEL2 denotes sampleN.scABEL(CV=c(CV_T, 0.3), theta0=0.9, design="2x2x4"))
Do I undestand correctly? If it so then there are always exist a miserable possibility that calculated by scABEL with CV_T=CV_R sample size would be insufficient?

[image]


"Being in minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad"

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
112 visitors (0 registered, 112 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:55 CET (Europe/Vienna)

With four parameters I can fit an elephant,
and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5