RRT|RTR|TRR drop outs [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2016-02-23 09:40 (3420 d 16:09 ago) – Posting: # 16019
Views: 6,822

Dear Helmut,

❝ the forum’s jury is still out and we are awaiting its verdict how to deal with the partial replicate design (RRT | RTR | TRR). If a subject drops out after the second period in the sequence RRT

I (!) would still include him / her in the estimation of CVwR. More data = better estimate.

emphasis by me

Me too. The SAS code of the FDA progesterone guidance forces this also: no missing in the calculation of the intra-subject contrast R-R.

But this requires that drop-outs are not considered as protocol deviation / violation in the study protocol.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,677 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5