Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Apples are pears by comparing the weight

Apples are pears by comparing the weight [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2015-12-03 10:16 (3060 d 11:21 ago) – Posting: # 15691
Views: 12,076

Dear Helmut,

❝ The line

❝ res[j, 7] <- sprintf("%.0f", max(cum))

❝ should be replaced by

❝ res[j, 7] <- sprintf("%.1f", (1-tmp1$pct_s2/100)*n[1] +


❝                                 (tmp1$pct_s2/100)*max(cum))

❝

❝ E[N]


❝             ───────────
❝ expected N   GSD    TSD
❝ ───────────────────────

❝     50      71.3   63.7

❝    100      84.6   99.2

❝ Interesting.

:confused:

What's your expected N?

BTW: ? cumsum.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Helmut 2015-11-27 19:05
- Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD ElMaestro 2015-11-27 19:54
- “classical” GSD - E[n] d_labes 2015-11-30 11:15
  - Apples are pears by comparing the weight Helmut 2015-12-01 16:35
    - Apples are pears by comparing the weightd_labes 2015-12-03 09:16
      - Apples are pears by comparing the weight Helmut 2015-12-03 13:10
        
        Oranges d_labes 2015-12-03 13:56
- Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Ben 2015-12-02 19:27
  - Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Helmut 2015-12-03 03:11
    - “classical” GSD alpha's d_labes 2015-12-03 09:47
      - N sufficiently large‽ Helmut 2015-12-03 14:56
        
        An other one with 0.0304 d_labes 2015-12-03 16:15
        
        An other one with 0.0304 Helmut 2015-12-03 16:26
    - Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Ben 2016-01-10 12:43

Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,661 registered users;
108 visitors (0 registered, 108 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity. Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz