AUMC ⇒ MRT [PK / PD]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-11-02 16:13 (3088 d 00:49 ago) – Posting: # 15606
Views: 7,624

BE-proff,

❝ […] I can't catch the idea why AUMC is required? :confused:


In the BE-context you generally don’t need it at all. It’s only an intermediate step in calculating MRT. Who asked for it?

❝ Can anybody explain me? :-)


We can see plasma profiles as the result of a stochastic process (drug molecules are absorbed, distributed, and metabolized/excreted). At any given time point a certain fraction is in the cir­cu­la­tion. Hey, that’s a sta­tis­tical distribution!

Distributions can be described by ‘statistical moments’

\(S_0=\int f(x)dx\)
\(S_1=\int x\cdot f(x)dx\)
\(S_2=\int x^2\cdot f(x)dx\)

where \(\small{S_0}\) is the AUC and \(\small{S_1}\) the AUMC (Area Under the Moment Curve). In PK \(\small{x=t}\) and \(\small{f(x)=C}\). We need the AUMC to calculate the MRT (Mean of Residence Times), which is for
Rule of thumb: After MRT ~⅔ of the drug is eliminated.

S2 is rarely used (for the calculation of the ‘Variance of Residence Times’): VRT = S2/S0 – (S1/S0)2. MRT and VRT are the coordinates (x|y) of the ‘center of gravity’ of the profile. Try it: Plot a PK-curve on cardboard and stick a pin through x|y. Makes a nice children’s wind wheel.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,651 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5