Different power of AUC vs. Cmax at stage I - continuation rules [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Nisha – Israel, 2015-09-17 22:27 (3136 d 13:20 ago) – Posting: # 15424
Views: 5,381

Hi ElMaestro,
Many thanks for your prompt response.

❝ good to hear the 2-stage approaches have not drawn their last breath.


May I ask why it is not so commonly used?

❝ You would still be analysing AUCt and Cmax at stage II if one such is conducted, even if AUCt has been shown BE at stage I.


What about a case in which AUC doesn't meet the BE criteria at stage I, but its power is >80% due to the low ISCV, while Cmax power is <80%? Could we still continue to stage II?

Thanks again,
Nisha

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,663 registered users;
82 visitors (0 registered, 82 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5