Call for duty [Software]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-07-21 15:04 (3981 d 21:02 ago) – Posting: # 15119
Views: 24,389

Dear Helmut,

❝ On the other hand agencies published SAS-code for some BE-methods (FDA: RSABE for HVDs and NTIDs; EMA: ABEL). It is certainly easier to copy-paste code compared to setting up / validating it in PHX/WNL (took me some weeks). Up to now nobody succeeded to code this stuff in R. :crying:


If you mean the statistics of such methods: Which one do you like first? I could imagine some ambitious R-coders out there which could be able to do the job.
Except of course implementing the SAS Proc mixed code for replicate designs :PCchaos:.

BTW: The reason for using SAS for the stats is very, very easy: "SAS is validated."

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
110 visitors (1 registered, 109 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5