Suitable matrix? [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-07-01 17:53 (3220 d 20:08 ago) – Posting: # 15006
Views: 6,116

Dear both,

I’m aware that both the FDA (in a guidance) and the EMA (in current practice) ask for measurement in serum. We all know that serum (or plasma) concentrations are a surrogate of the concentrations at the site of action (which in general is not accessible).
However, Fe stimulates the production of erythrocytes in the bone marrow (hey, the site of action!) of Fe-deficient patients. In my understanding measuring in whole blood would be more reasonable.
Just my 2 ¢.

On another note using stable isotope labelled products (57Fe and/or 58Fe) could help in distinguishing endo­genous from dosed Fe.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,655 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5