Calculation of AUCt, AUCall, AUCinf... [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2007-11-28 11:37 (5965 d 11:22 ago) – Posting: # 1340
Views: 24,905

Dear HS,

Hey, that's a nice post and a nice demonstration. By the way, nice new home page, too.

❝ It's definitely better to go with Method #5, which is standard according to the WHO, European any many other countries' guidelines.


I couldn't find any recommendation on this in the EU BE guideline, which only states that the method used to calculate AUC should be specified, or in the old PK in man guideline. Anyway the EU BE guideline recommends the use of AUCt as the "most reliable estimate of the extent of absorption" anyway. I couldn't find it either in the WHO guideline, which mentions "Clast" and defines it as "last measurable concentration". I couldn't say about BA trials (where there would be more modelling anyway) but I think I've only seen once a BE trial using Method #5.

Is there any recommendation I have missed in EU or WHO guideline, or made at a conference ?

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,636 registered users;
74 visitors (0 registered, 74 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:00 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shows a lack of mathematical education more
than an overly precise calculation.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5