Calculation of AUCt, AUCall, AUCinf... [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2007-11-28 11:37 (6768 d 16:01 ago) – Posting: # 1340
Views: 31,164

Dear HS,

Hey, that's a nice post and a nice demonstration. By the way, nice new home page, too.

❝ It's definitely better to go with Method #5, which is standard according to the WHO, European any many other countries' guidelines.


I couldn't find any recommendation on this in the EU BE guideline, which only states that the method used to calculate AUC should be specified, or in the old PK in man guideline. Anyway the EU BE guideline recommends the use of AUCt as the "most reliable estimate of the extent of absorption" anyway. I couldn't find it either in the WHO guideline, which mentions "Clast" and defines it as "last measurable concentration". I couldn't say about BA trials (where there would be more modelling anyway) but I think I've only seen once a BE trial using Method #5.

Is there any recommendation I have missed in EU or WHO guideline, or made at a conference ?

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
114 visitors (0 registered, 114 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5