Randomisation? [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-06-10 16:53 (3606 d 07:28 ago) – Posting: # 13050
Views: 16,261

Hi ElMaestro & Khaoula,

❝ I think what was meant was that the allocated sequence for subject 15 is unknown/missing/evaporated/gone/lost? If aiming for balance which is standard you may be able to guess it pretty well provided the sequences of the other 8+7 subjects are correct :pirate:


Since we have seven subjects in sequence RT and eight in sequence TR, we might guess that #15 was planned for sequence RT. ;-)

❝ Anyways, guessing isn't science,


Yep.

❝ and I just wonder how such an event could happen […]



Khaoula wrote in her OP:

❝ ❝ we have design of bioequivalence study cross over design with 16 subject (randomised), but at the firt period the 15 suject didn't come […]



❝ How could info on randomisation for a single subject be missing?


Good question.

❝ ❝ without protocol for the management of dropouts


I wouldn’t call #15 a “drop-out” but rather a “no-show”.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,655 registered users;
80 visitors (0 registered, 80 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5