Randomisation? [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-06-10 03:00 (3579 d 11:26 ago) – Posting: # 13046
Views: 16,157

Hi Khaoula and Helmut,

❝ ❝ I havnt randomisation of subject 15, and then they put the result in kinetica they excluded him,


❝ The randomization of an excluded subject is not required anyhow.


I think what was meant was that the allocated sequence for subject 15 is unknown/missing/evaporated/gone/lost? If aiming for balance which is standard you may be able to guess it pretty well provided the sequences of the other 8+7 subjects are correct :pirate:
Anyways, guessing isn't science, and I just wonder how such an event could happen - could you comment, Khaoula? How could info on randomisation for a single subject be missing?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,957 posts in 4,819 threads, 1,639 registered users;
102 visitors (0 registered, 102 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:27 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shows a lack of mathematical education more
than an overly precise calculation.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5