Naproxen ER FDA guidance [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by lechia – C of U, 2014-04-24 18:49 (4444 d 02:25 ago) – Posting: # 12891
Views: 4,413

❝ Coincidentally, I found a pending citizen petition related to BE criteria for Naprelan (extended release Naproxen). The petitioner did ask FDA to request partial AUCs. In checking the package insert, EC-Naprosyn (enteric coated Naproxen for delayed release) was not approved for acute pain as the release is delayed. I would like to know your opinion on this citizen petition.



For some reason I can't reply to sonny's post and had to reply to my own.

It's funny that they call it a citizen petition, because it's a petition of an interested party (the patent holder trying to protect their product from generic competition). The goal here is to make it harder for others to get bioequivalence with their product by requiring partial AUCs.

I guess anyone running a BE study for this product is advised in case the FDA is convinced by Almatica.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
145 visitors (0 registered, 145 guests [including 36 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5