Errors happen [NCA / SHAM]

posted by fno Homepage – Belgium, 2014-03-20 12:03 (4464 d 18:22 ago) – Posting: # 12676
Views: 24,740

❝ Me too :cool:!

❝ You are absolutely correct in questioning these formulas. What here would be correct is:

24*(-0.20027)+4.60838 = -0.1981

❝ and

16.92*(-0.19992)+4.55224=1.169594


And then (from Jungmin's AUCt),

For ref:
Clast_pred=exp(-0.1981)=0.82029
AUCinf_pred=401.88595+0.82029/0.20027=405.98186

For test:
Clast_pred=exp(1.169594)=3.22068
AUCinf_pred=367.642+3.22068/0.19992=383.75186

T/R=94.5244%
Bias=-0.5006%

Kind regards,
Fabrice

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
207 visitors (0 registered, 207 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5