Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • FDA: antique of ’93

FDA: antique of ’93 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2013-12-11 17:21 (3787 d 14:54 ago) – Posting: # 12038
Views: 11,201

Hi Helmut,

❝ THX! Did you ask the guy with the Buster Keaton face again?

Nope, I asked the chefs (formulators) and RA.

❝ BTW: Your partial replicate nightmare (#10563). Did you receive an answer from Mr Schuirmann?

Nope. I emailed him two questions and no feedback so far (2nd one was about stats for a partial rep study having 2 groups).

John

Complete thread:

FDA: Size of bio-batch Helmut 2013-12-10 14:05 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- FDA: Size of bio-batch jag009 2013-12-10 20:03
  - FDA: antique of ’93 Helmut 2013-12-10 23:32
    - FDA: antique of ’93 jag009 2013-12-11 15:23
      - FDA: antique of ’93 Helmut 2013-12-11 15:26
        
        FDA: antique of ’93jag009 2013-12-11 16:21
        
        FDA: antique of ’93 Helmut 2013-12-11 16:29
        
        FDA: antique of ’93 jag009 2013-12-11 23:16
        
        Patience Helmut 2013-12-12 14:34
    - FDA: antique of ’93 Beholder 2018-06-21 09:21
      - Nice numbers Helmut 2018-06-21 15:05
        
        Nice numbers Beholder 2018-06-22 10:33
        
        Type II variation Helmut 2018-06-22 15:12
      - Birdsong's third law of BE ElMaestro 2018-06-22 10:10
        
        Experience Beholder 2018-06-22 11:04
        
        Why, oh why? Helmut 2018-06-22 15:17
        
        Sorry for the delay Beholder 2018-10-18 09:40

Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,657 registered users;
108 visitors (0 registered, 108 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means. Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz