Using sampling “windows” for PK blood samples [Design Issues]

posted by teuscher – US, 2013-11-15 04:55 (4604 d 10:25 ago) – Posting: # 11888
Views: 8,073

(edited on 2013-11-15 10:16)

I appreciate the comments and thoughts on my blog post. Perhaps my comments were taken out of context. The context of my comments was whether or not we need to define a "window" during which we must draw a blood sample. And if the sample is outside of that window we declare it a protocol deviation.

As this group stated time point selection is very important to accurately capture the characteristics of a pharmacokinetic profile. We often use optimization algorithms to choose the best time points.

However, once the nominal time points are chosen, does it really matter if a sample is drawn 5-15 minutes early or late? Unless that deviation overlaps a subsequent nominal sampling time, I still posit that it does not matter. As an example, if your sampling times are 0.5, 1, and 1.5 hours. The sample at 1 hour can be taken at 0.75, 1, or 1.25 hrs and still give reasonable results.

Interested in your thoughts ...

Nathan Teuscher


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
98 visitors (0 registered, 98 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5