monitor [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-09-11 00:48 (4669 d 19:23 ago) – Posting: # 11473
Views: 12,179

❝ ❝ For 41 mins??? I still want to know how many holes they punched the poor subject with!


❝ Did the monitor have any remarks in the report? Did (s)he visit on the day this happened?


Waiting for their "explanation"... Study info to be released in upcoming weeks. So far the explanation is "restick". The clinic thought subjects were not hydrated adequately before dosing in Period 1 so they ask them to drink more the night before period 2. Problem solved? Sort of but nope, still had long time deivations...

In my opinion the subject should've been dropped. Its not ethical to keep on poking for blood for so long... It occured at 3.5-4 hr so the P.I. should've made a decision (A DOCTOR!)

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
129 visitors (0 registered, 129 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5