FA0(1) for partial replicate in Phoenix [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by lhughes – USA, 2013-08-30 17:17 (3883 d 11:34 ago) – Posting: # 11395
Views: 8,200

Hi Helmut!

You have:

❝ When I set up FA0(1) in PHX’ LME I got…

❝ ERROR 11021: Variance matrix is not positive definite in QA.

❝ Now for the surprise: PHX’ BE-model (which supposedly sits ‘on top’ of LME) converged without a warning. I got

PE 101.0213% (90% CI: 80.7733–126.3450%) s²WR 0.42100 (CVWR 72.35%)

… matching Shuanghe’s and your’s in SAS with FDA’s FA0(2)-parameterization.

❝ After exclusion of incomplete data (subjects 8, 14, 17, and 31)

PE  91.2423% (90% CI: 74.0705–112.3950%) s²WR 0.40652 (CVWR 70.82%)

… different to yours’.


I was able to run both LinMix and Bioeq in Phoenix and their results matched. Also when I excluded the four subjects with incomplete data, I got:
PE=  90.503   90% CI: 73.561–111.347
so the same as what Detlew posted in his next post with the SAS results. I emailed you a project.

Linda

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,986 posts in 4,823 threads, 1,656 registered users;
56 visitors (0 registered, 56 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Art is “I”; science is “we”.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5