Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum 11:37 CET

Main page Policy/Terms of Use Abbreviations Latest Posts

 Log in |  Register |  Search

Science vs. regulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage - Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-06 14:30  - Posting: # 10161
Views: 5,435

Dear Ratnakar,

EMA’s opinion [sic] that AUCt is a reliable estimate of extent of absorption only if AUCt ≥ 80% of AUC is scientifically questionable if (!) IR formulations are concerned (absorption practically completed at 2–4× tmax). Therefore, we need more information.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. ☼
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Mix view
Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum |  Admin contact
19,187 posts in 4,084 threads, 1,308 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 6 identified bots]).

In these days, a man who says a thing cannot be done
is quite apt to be interrupted by some idiot doing it.    Elbert Green Hubbard

The BIOEQUIVALENCE / BIOAVAILABILITY FORUM is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5 RSS Feed