Re-consenting volunteers? [Off Topic]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2016-06-22 07:06 (3300 d 23:22 ago) – Posting: # 16435
Views: 40,673

Dear El Maestro,

❝ I am not a native French speaker but I think I sometimes understand a little bit of written French.


I am a native French speaker but there are a number of points in this report which I'm not getting either.

❝ Does the inquest into the Bial/Biotrial incident suggest that the volunteers should perhaps, possibly, maybe have been asked to re-confirm their consent after the initial SAE in their dosing group?


No, it does not suggest any such thing. It affirms it.

❝ Is there a French guideline or legal document specifically discussing re-consenting?


Not that I know of. Apart from the recent press releases of the Minister, of course :crying:.

If you want to practice your French, have a look at Biotrial's response to the initial inspection report. A "lost for lost", last pleasure kind of thing. You'll see for instance that in their initial report the inspectors made reference to a ministerial Order of 2006 on the notification of SAEs... which had been replaced by a new Order in April 2014. This gives some idea on how well these guys know and understand our laws and regulations governing clinical trials.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5