BE study designs [Design Issues]

posted by Essar – 2006-01-17 05:53 (7449 d 02:47 ago) – Posting: # 55
Views: 33,296

❝ Your design is not balanced in respect to all effects in the model, in other words, 3 combinations of treatments are missing. The chance of regulatory acceptance of a 3×3 is close to zero.

❝ The simplest design you may apply is a Williams’ design (3-treatment, 3-period, 6-sequence):


Dear Helmut,
Thanks once again for taking the time out.

When you say that chance of regulatory acceptance of 3x3 is close to zero, you mean specifically for 3x3x3, or it is applicable to 3x3x6 design also?

Also, can you please let me know the reason for the same.

Now, I will start hunting for the references you have given me.

Regards,
Essar

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
212 visitors (0 registered, 212 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5