3 way pilot study [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-01-09 17:57 (7096 d 18:56 ago) – Posting: # 444
Views: 5,815

Dear ioanam!

❝ I just found that our client want in the bioequivalence study to compare the higher strength for the test with the same strength of the reference marketed in Europe versus USA. Is this possible? In the bioequivalence guidelines is specified that the reference must be the innovator. I did not found other 3 way crossover studies to investigate this.


So your comparisons will be:
Test (1000 mg) vs. ‘Reference A’ (1000 mg) EU and
Test (1000 mg) vs. ‘Reference B’ (1000 mg) US

Why not?
Of course ‘Reference A’ must be an innovator’s product registered within the EEA (European Economic Area) or Switzerland (Mutual Recognition Agreement-Country), and ‘Reference B’ the RLD.
In my experience three-way BE studies are more common (and accepted) in the EU than in the USA.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
114 visitors (0 registered, 114 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5