3 way pilot study [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2006-12-22 13:43 (7114 d 20:51 ago) – Posting: # 417
Views: 5,766

Dear ioanam!

❝ I have to perform a 3 way cross over pilot study.

❝ The test product is available in 4 strengths (e.q. 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg) with dose proportionality between these strengths. The pharmacokinetics is not influenced by food.

❝ Is a good design for this study a 3 way crossover study in fasted conditions with 3 sequences, 3 treatments and 3 periods with:

❝ Test A – test product 4 x 250 mg

❝ Test B – test product 1000 mg

❝ Reference – reference (1000 mg)?


Yes, that’s a reasonable design, with the exeption that you should apply a six sequence design. For details see this post.

If in a later stage you go for a pivotal study you should consult the regulatory agency, since e.g., some European regulators want to see for such a design (2 test formulations) a Bonferroni-corrected confidence interval (95% instead of 90%) in order to keep the patient’s risk at 5% (EMEA’s Points to Consider on Multiplicity Issues in Clinical Trials).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
116 visitors (0 registered, 116 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5