Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

n=180 4-period full replicate [Design Issues]

posted by dshah – India, 2024-05-08 18:11 (768 d 05:25 ago) – Posting: # 23992
Views: 7,965

Hi Helmut!

According to me, there is clear requirement to improve T/R ratio from 0.85 to at least 0.9 which can reduce the sample size as well.
Regards,
Divyen

Complete thread:

Large sample size in a BE study Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:28
- My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 13:34
  - My record: ≈400 Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:49
    - My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 14:19
  - My record: ≈400 nobody 2024-05-03 18:44
    - n=180 4-period full replicate Helmut 2024-05-03 22:25
      - n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-06 15:56
        
        HVNTID! mittyri 2024-05-07 07:35
      - n=180 4-period full replicatedshah 2024-05-08 16:11
        
        Lousy T/R-ratio Helmut 2024-05-08 16:18
        n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-17 13:45

Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
118 visitors (0 registered, 118 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another. Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz