Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • My record: ≈400

My record: ≈400 [Design Issues]

posted by Achievwin – US, 2024-05-03 15:49 (773 d 14:21 ago) – Posting: # 23978
Views: 8,286

❝ Define magnitude. :-D If you mean hundreds, yes. Multi-center in patients.

❝ BTW, I have seen 4-period full replicate studies with 180 healthy volunteers…

wow for a full replicate N=400 the sponsor has deep pockets…

Thanks for your response

Complete thread:

Large sample size in a BE study Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:28
- My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 13:34
  - My record: ≈400Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:49
    - My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 14:19
  - My record: ≈400 nobody 2024-05-03 18:44
    - n=180 4-period full replicate Helmut 2024-05-03 22:25
      - n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-06 15:56
        
        HVNTID! mittyri 2024-05-07 07:35
      - n=180 4-period full replicate dshah 2024-05-08 16:11
        
        Lousy T/R-ratio Helmut 2024-05-08 16:18
        n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-17 13:45

Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
145 visitors (0 registered, 145 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it. Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz