Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Switchability with replicate design studies [Design Issues]

posted by Achievwin – US, 2022-05-20 06:44 (1487 d 08:02 ago) – Posting: # 23005
Views: 7,574

Question for study design experts.

If we want to introduce assessment or claim using BE study which design is more appropriate? 3-way cross over partial study or 4-way cross full replicate design. Please share your experience.

Sincerely,

Achiewin

Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

Switchability with replicate design studiesAchievwin 2022-05-20 04:44
- Switchability = IBE Helmut 2022-05-20 09:17
  - Switchability = IBE Achievwin 2022-05-20 14:19
    - S × F interaction Helmut 2022-05-20 15:33
      - S × F interaction Achievwin 2022-05-20 23:32
      - S × F interaction Brus 2023-06-06 11:02
        
        S × F interaction Helmut 2023-06-07 10:34
        
        S × F interaction Achievwin 2023-06-08 10:21

Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
118 visitors (0 registered, 118 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another. Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz