BE of MR versus IR? [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2006-05-28 15:28 (7329 d 10:29 ago) – Posting: # 141
Views: 9,261

Hi Joy!

❝ How would you conduct/assess BE of 2 drug products of the same active ingredient but of different dosage formats and strengths i.e. immediate-release, 130 mg per tablet versus sustained-release, 200 mg per tablet?


It’s not possible to show bioequivalence between an immediate release and a modified release form – although the extent of BA may be the same, just by definition the rate of BA should be different.
Another point in the definition of BE requires administration of the same molar dose. Since the least common multiple of 200 and 130 ist 2600, it would mean comparison of 20 IR tablets v.s. 13 SR tablets.
I’m afraid, in this case the cards are stacked against you…

At least if your drug shows linear pharmacokinetics within 130 mg and 200 mg you may perfom a comparative bioavailability study and normalize dose-dependent PK parameters of the 200 mg formulation to 130 mg; but remember, this is not BE.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
134 visitors (0 registered, 134 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5