Russian «Экс­пер­тами» following the EEU GLs [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Beholder  – Russia, 2017-05-25 00:37 (2961 d 09:57 ago) – Posting: # 17410
Views: 30,816

Hello Helmut!

❝ Does any of our Russian members know whether the above was ever accepted? This section talks about giving in the report a justification for not performing such an analysis. Has anybody ever tried to give the justification already in the protocol? If yes, what happened? If no, why not?


You are citing too fresh doc I think. The doc came into force on 6th of May. So strictly speaking it was not obligatory to use draft of the doc during clinical trial conducting before 6th of May. So, nobody used it I think and no experience was gathered.

But I would try it))

If Im not mistaken, you wrote something about such algorithm somewhere in forum but I could not find it.

Best regards
Beholder

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,684 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can do one of two things; just shut up,
which is something I don’t find easy,
or learn an awful lot very fast,
which is what I tried to do.    Jane Fonda

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5