Not positive about that [Nonparametrics]

posted by martin  – Austria, 2010-09-16 23:00 (5747 d 09:41 ago) – Posting: # 5922
Views: 27,064

Dear HS!

thank you for your point of view, I just have a minor comment regarding the interpretation of relative effects. It's a probability that a randomly selected subject with R has a larger tmax value than a randomly selected subject with T (no effect would be indicated by a relative effect of 0.5).

for the given dataset, the probability of a randomly selected subject with R having a larger tmax value than a randomly selected subject with T is 63.3% (90% CI: 35.4% to 84.4%).

the other way round, the probability of a randomly selected subject with T having a smaller tmax value than a randomly selected subject with R is 63.3% (90% CI: 35.4% to 84.4%).

best regards

martin

PS.: this is a naive application to the dataset - some adjustments may necessary to account for the cross over design

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
142 visitors (0 registered, 142 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5