Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Tmax (Phoenix WinNonlin 6.0/6.1) [Nonparametrics]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2009-06-12 20:55 (6212 d 07:51 ago) – Posting: # 3852
Views: 16,471

Hi Simon,

the bug is still there (Phoenix 6.0.0.1648); logged an incident (#00065507) again...

---

Edit 1: Incident was closed on June 24^th, 2009 with the note:

[…] this issue has been logged in our tracking system for review and to rectify if necessary in a future Phoenix WinNonlin release (QC 7904).

So what about previous versions of WNL?

---

Edit 2: The issue was partly resolved in Phoenix 6.1 (build 6.1.0.173, October 2009). Now in the Crossover Setup there is a combo-box to select the 'Reference Treatment'. No need any more to change signs or recode treatments to lexical order. The confidence level in the column 'Exact' is still wrong – maybe in the next decade…
The Release Notes give it as a known issue: Crossover design: "Exact" heading for the p-value (QC 7904): In the Crossover Design tool, the confidence levels reported as "Exact" for the crossover differences (e.g., Treatment_Diff(T-R)) are the target levels rather than exact levels.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! 
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• Tmax chidambarajoshi 2008-08-13 10:02 
  • Tmax ElMaestro 2008-08-13 10:25
    • Tmax chidambarajoshi 2008-08-13 10:49
      • Tmax (EU) Helmut 2008-08-13 13:48
        • Tmax (EU) chidambarajoshi 2008-08-14 06:30
          • Tmax (WinNonlin) Helmut 2008-08-14 20:12
            • Tmax (WinNonlin) chidambarajoshi 2008-08-25 09:47
            • Tmax (WinNonlin) SDavis 2008-11-18 19:47
              • Tmax (WinNonlin) Helmut 2008-11-18 20:15
              • Tmax (Phoenix WinNonlin 6.0/6.1)Helmut 2009-06-12 18:55