Moses CI [Nonparametrics]

posted by Dr Andrew Leary – Ireland, 2009-01-27 12:41 (6345 d 06:53 ago) – Posting: # 3136
Views: 19,545

Thank you both for your responses.

I had not picked up that point during my hasty reading of the new (draft) guideline, Helmut, but saw your extensive discussions of same when looking at the forum yesterday evening.

At present all our BE protocols stick with the old guideline and require non-parametric assessment of Tmax. I can foresee a time in 2 years when we'll have to repeat part of every analysis to provide parametric results. Are you sure that this aspect of the new guideline will stick? I'm a clinician not a statistician, but it seems to me that perfroming parametric stats on a small amount of categorical data flies in the face of traditional teaching.

Kind regards

Andrew

--
Edit: Full quote removed. Please see this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
119 visitors (0 registered, 119 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5