Results Analysis [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by unique_one – India, 2014-07-08 10:58 (4018 d 19:16 ago) – Posting: # 13234
Views: 19,077

Dear All,

Results obtained from 2 way-crossover study of 28 volunteers are as mentioned below:

90% CI AUC: Lower limit - 98.35, Upper limit - 132.50
90% CI Cmax: Lower limit - 95.38, Upper limit - 127.80

T/R ratio of AUC: 112.2
T/R ratio of Cmax: 109.5

Intrasubject CV% AUC: 27.3
Intrasubject CV% Cmax: 28.2

Questions:
  1. Primary reason for BE Failure?
  2. Do re-formulation would be needed?
Regards,
unique_one.


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,695 registered users;
73 visitors (0 registered, 73 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If I’d observed all the rules,
I’d never have got anywhere.    Marilyn Monroe

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5