I thought I have seen everything [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-08-19 22:40 (4340 d 22:13 ago) – Posting: # 11308
Views: 9,058

Hi all,

Apparently not...

Question. If a study requires partial AUC at early phase of the plasma concentration-time curve, is it acceptable to implement in the protocol "Subject will be removed from the study if more than x blood draws cannot be collected within x min of schedule time during post-dose 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4 hours?"

Given the fact that the variability of PAUC can be high, can the above be implemented at all? I know it probably doesn't happen but...
Obvious with the above example, the subject will be dropped out if he/she misses the 4 hr sample since PAUC0-4 requires 4 hour timepoint.

My answer to my questio? "As long as you state it in the protocol" Why I asked? Tada, some CRO managed to screw up some early timepoint collection by as much as 35mins! :no:

Thanks

John


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,697 registered users;
71 visitors (0 registered, 71 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority
is not using his intelligence;
he is just using his memory.    Leonardo da Vinci

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5